Unity Audio Cancer Fighter Speaker Cable Reviews

If bare wire can be used, nothing is better IMHO. Why add extra metal/metal interfaces and more (largely dissimilar materials(solder, whatever material whatever connector is made of, often brass and not "pure" copper)? This will only degrade SQ. Granted I doubt the vast vast majority of people have ears or systems good enough to tell(but I think a very small % could differentiate blind ABX) so mostly talking theory here, but still.

Best is to crank binding posts down on bare wire and create as many metallic binds as possible.

$0.02
 
Last edited:
If the gear uses spring clips or guillotine connectors, then the Flexpin lets you use larger than 14 gauge wire. And, it prevents your bare wire from oxidizing. Plus, the Flexpin is attached with a cold weld, so it's like not having an interface at all.
 
Your reasoning behind spring clips and guillotine connectors (not sure what they are, probably some type of spring clip) does make sense and do enable the use thicker wire, which can be a plus for sure. And crimping (cold welding, i.e. create metallic bonds with pressure) also makes sense. So your points are very valid. So sorry if insinuated that bare wire is best under all situations as you bring up cases where it very well might not be/isnt. Also, in the bigger picture and as mentioned earlier, I doubt the vast vast majority of people could tell, talking theory here.

IMHO, in an ideal situation, one cleans the bare wire as best possible, if it is solid core thicker wire then sand with fine paper, followed by alcohol or acetone clean, ideally in ultrasonic cleaner, for stranded wire perhaps fine sand (or not), but at least clean with alcohol/acetone. Then crank down binding posts.

Having said that, Ive used those "flexpins" and under certain situations (like pin connectors on 70s/80s gear like Luxman M120A amp), they are an excellent/arguably the best option. You will get more contact, i.e. form more metallic bonds with them vs. a hard Nakamichi(or whatever brand) pin bc there is more surface area (both apparent area of contact and thus real area of contact since they are easy to "squash") of contact to begin with.

Dont mean to argumentative and clearly you know what you are talking about. In addition, and as you mention, those flexpins are gold plated so oxidation is much much less of an issue(vs. bare wire copper), depending on the purity of gold (less pure=more oxidation, pure gold does not oxidize).

Thanks cableguy, very valid points!
 
Last edited:
I'm sure there are many who are content with 14awg wire (or - gasp - smaller) of either solid or stranded copper, and don't mind doing all the extra work of cleaning and stripping every year to stay ahead of the inevitable oxidation.
Those hard pins? They just suck. The contact point is almost zero, and indeed, in that case, bare wire would be better.
 
I dont just "talk the talk", I also "walk the walk" lol. I used to be in the interfacial processes department of what is now Teledyne Technologies headquarters, I troubleshot problems caused by/at interfaces, mostly metal/metal, for 7 years, so thats where Im coming from with my theory. Interfaces tend to be problem areas(electrical, thermal, mechanical, etc). Here is some Tara Labs Space & Time Quantum III that I hacked off the spades and bananas to get to bare wire. But when you crank down on solid core wire with speaker binding posts, the connection slightly loosens over time. Stranded wire, not so much, and those "flexpins" seemed to stay tight as I recall, though binding posts loosening on their own with flexpins and thus leading to oxidation isnt an issue since flexpins are gold plated.


rlyiCGn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice!
Indeed, the Flexpin would only be for those stupid posts on vintage gear.
For 5-way binding posts, I'd only go with a bayonet style deltron banana. They never loosen over time.
I hate spades, and offer them reluctantly.
 
Back
Top